Issue No. 3

Confronting Nature: Living with other beings.

What is our everyday relationship with what we call nature?

 
Cutwork, Confronting Nature, banner sketch.jpg
 
 

Unfold, Issue No. 3
Confronting Nature

Nature is a big abstraction that we all feel collectively familiar with, yet rarely stop to interrogate.

Historically, nature has been understood both as a great oppositional force to be protected against and as an endless source of materials for human expansion. In the best cases today, we relate to nature as something to be taken care of and preserved from our activities. But beyond our sapiens-centered conceptions, the notion of nature can be more concretely understood as a network of interdependent species which we are a part of.

We have inherited this loaded conception of nature. As a result, we are facing a crises of attention towards non-human living beings. What can we do to reframe our definition and everyday relationship with what we call nature? In what ways can we design our environments to reactivate biodiversity and cohabitate with other species? What are the boundaries between what we call natural, artificial, and original?

This third edition of Unfold interrogates our inherited conceptions of nature and explores key questions about nature’s role in the next urban era.

 
 
— A city in the next urban era?


A city in the next urban era?

 
 


Almost anyone will instinctively recognize the shape of a logo, even from far away or in small print at the bottom of a poster. An American study in 2014 showed that North-American children, ages 4 to 10, could recognize and distinguish thousands of different brands instantly at first glance — yet were not able to identify the leafs of ten plants from their local environments.1

The very mechanism of our perceptions has changed. Our fundamental sensitivity to recognize patterns in our environment has shifted toward manufactured goods. This replacement is only accelerating as our attention becomes monetized and the economy of attention booms. We are building an environment around us where everything wants our attention all the time – and where the first-hand experience of nature is increasingly excluded.

 
 

North-American children, from the age of 4 to 10, can recognize and distinguish thousands of different brands instantly, at first glance — yet are unable to identify the leaves of ten plants from their local environments.


 
 


Nature itself is shrinking in size and growing more distant. More and more we are losing touch with the diversity of species we share and inhabit our spaces with. Globally, 55% of people now live in urban areas.2 In most Western countries, this is even higher (France for ex: 61%).2 By the turn of the century, Americans already spent 87% of their time indoors.3 Today, kids only spend an average of 4–7 minutes outdoors per day while spending an average of 7½ hours a day on electronics.4

With our lifestyles becoming increasingly urban, our collective imagination and experience of wild nature is becoming entirely framed. We are forgetting nature – let alone its wildness. Our experiences increasingly rely on the same filtered and beautified narratives of nature documentaries and children’s books. Nature has merged into the background, a decor, the grey noise beneath our activities. We have reduced it almost exclusively to serving as a resource, which also happens to be pleasant to look at on a stroll.


 

 

Urban Bird Quiz

Here are five common birds found in European cities. How many of them can you recognise? (Answers at bottom of page.)

Next Step: Can you spot any of them within your local urban environment?

 

 



This detached relationship has serious consequences for our ecosystems. An estimated 421 million birds have disappeared in Europe in the last thirty years, while over 3 billion have disappeared in North America since 1970 – a quarter of the total population.5, 6 Today, more than one in seven bird species is threatened with extinction or has already disappeared (1,360 of the 9,990 known species).7 Of these species, 138 are extinct and 15 are considered critically endangered.7 Overall, 40.3% of bird species are considered to be in decline today.7 Some species are more vulnerable than others, especially ones dependent on insects for food: according to National Geographic reporting, over the last 30 years, the standardization of once rural landscapes and industrial production of food has wiped out 80% of Europe’s flying insect population.8 Our deficit of attention toward nature has made us forget that we share our territories with more species than our own.


 
 

An estimated 421 million birds have disappeared in Europe in the last thirty years, while over 3 billion have disappeared in North America since 1970 – 29% of the total population.


 
 



Historic fictions drove the first artificial wedge between us and nature in Western culture. We are still confronting a strong conceptual heritage today – that nature is present to serve as our tool and resource for human civilization. Nature is “the great other” — a scary mysterious force to be overcome or controlled. This perspective is fueled by two conceptual mistakes: we compare “natural” to “artificial” and misdefine what is “natural” with what was once “original.” In truth today, relatively few hectares of virgin Amazonian forest remain in their “original” or “untouched” states. And with mankind’s relentless impact on the global composition of our atmosphere, even this conception of “untouched" can be easily challenged. Does this mean that our world is no longer natural anymore?

We have forgotten a simpler, more elegant truth: as humans, we arose and evolved from the same molecular processes and physics governing anything else in the universe. We are “natural” by default, and thus, so are all of our activities. Yes, technology, AI, and video games are all extending branches of nature in this respect. And yes, even human-made climate change could be considered a “force of nature.” But in this lies the key issue: our entire conception of “nature” is now tinted by human activities – distorted by our own degrees of involvement and accountability.

 
 
— We compare “natural” to “artificial” and misdefine what is “natural” with what was once “original.”


We compare “natural” to “artificial” and misdefine what is “natural” with what was once “original.”

 
 


It is time to dismantle our transactional relationship with nature. Even when well intended, the idea that we need “to take care of Nature” preserves a strong bias. We often see this come up in discussions around integrating nature within architecture and design – arguments about the fact that exposure to nature is good for our health: “We should take care of Nature because it makes us healthier.” But this perspective still upholds the flawed understanding that we are separated and apart from nature.

Such historic boundaries we have built with nature are artificial – fictions of our own making. Nature is an abstract concept we have inherited and constructed. Until now, we have collectively understood it as something working against us. From this logic, it’s always easier to find differences: “We are not part of Nature, I am not an animal, I am not a woman / man, I am not in your religion, I am not of your nationality, etc.” Where does one rationally draw the line on what acceptable differences may be? “I do not have the same color eyes, I do not have the same body shape, I do not have the same number of freckles. I am not the same as anyone, hence, I am exceptional.” If we follow this tendency toward exclusivity, we are bound to be alone. Beyond moral responsibility, fabricating a line to define what is or is not an 'acceptable tolerance’ is completely arbitrary – a self-imposed boundary only limiting ourselves.

 
 
— For us, 'together' is not just between humans. How inclusive are we ready to be?


For us, 'together' is not just between humans. How inclusive are we ready to be?

 
 


Fully integrated and inclusive perspectives of nature could even lead to more inclusive understandings of each other. Reinventing our relationship to nature means reinventing our relationships in a much wider sense: between humans and humans, women and men, adults and children, working and retired. If we recognize that we are a part of nature: We are animals, we are humans, we are conscious, we are alive. If we choose it to be inclusive to nature, suddenly we are together. And today, this extends even as far as between humans and machines, between people and engineered forms of life. Within nature, new kinds of differences are emerging: We are not yet robots, we are not yet genetically enhanced, we are not yet engineered in labs. But these differences are coming fast. How inclusive are we going to be on these fronts?

Perhaps our conception of “nature” could be replaced by a new conception of “living beings.” Baptiste Morizot is a French philosopher and animal tracker. For him, the cultural heritage of Western society has fueled a deficit of attention towards non-human living beings.9 He invites us to “reinvent and adjust our perspectives in order to find new ways to exist as living beings” and “to learn to cohabitate with the alterity.”9 To define and understanding nature as a fabric of interdependent species, rather than an abstract concept, is a means to overcome the fiction of nature the Western world was built upon. This could help reframe our perspectives and renew a sensitive and practical relationship with the multiplicity of other life forms and their needs. We need to embrace the fact that we are a part of this bigger system of lives – a vast ensemble of ‘milieus’ in which we coexist. And it’s time to design our habitats accordingly.


 
 

For us, buildings should be planted like trees to activate biodiversity in our cities. What's at stake is our capacity to create a new original environment where architecture is no longer an “artificial” structure, but one supporting intricate relationships between different kinds of sentient lives.


 
 


Sapien’s architecture arose out of necessity to protect us from the elements – making a little fortress to separate and shield us from the unpredictability of nature. We are used to thinking about architecture as a protective shelter against nature. Instead of building our territories upon this conception of nature, we believe architecture is about opening the senses to the immediate environment and the greater territories shared between species.

For us, 'together' is not just between humans. In the city, even without the urban hum and rumble of activity, the environment is not quiet. Urban birds warble, trill, babble, chatter, cry, croak, whistle, hoot, and sing. Architecture could be designed to draw our attention towards the multitude of motions that surrounds us. For us, the city must become an environment conducive to blossoming and the natural proliferation of life. Buildings could be planted like trees to activate local biodiversity – designed for the network of interdependent living beings, including ourselves. Buildings should actively give back more to our ecosystems than they take out in spaces and resources. What's at stake is our capacity to create a new original environment where architecture is no longer an “artificial” structure, but one supporting intricate relationships between different kinds of life.

 
 
— Bird Wall is a scalable facade system we designed to reactivate local biodiversity in dense urban habitats.


Bird Wall is a scalable facade system we designed to reactivate local biodiversity in dense urban habitats.

 
 


We shape and are shaped back by fictions, and nature is one of the biggest. This is a dynamic dialog. Personal fictions—our identities, attentions, perspectives—are surprisingly malleable and open to reinvention. The contours of our personal identities are negotiated with the larger 'intersubjective’ reality of our collective narratives. The whole history of Western society has been pushing against nature’s limits, rooting for mankind to win against this existential foe. The fiction of nature is one of the big contemporary narratives severing our togetherness and restricting our collaborative potential. Let’s confront it now.

 
 
 

 
 
 

[The ideal city] is welcoming not only to human beings, but also to other sentient beings on our planet.10

— Steph Wade
The Ideal City, SPACE10

 
 

 

Urban
Birds Quiz

  • 1
    Eurasian Wren


    2
    Short-toed Treecreeper


    3
    Common Starling


    4
    Common Swift


    5
    Eurasian Nuthatch

Edition

Unfold is a pocket-size, one-page magazine full of ideas for today’s living.

Every other week, one A4, one topic – from the perspectives of designers, inventors, sociologists, architects, and ecologists.

By architecture and design studio CUTWORK.

Writers

Bryce Willem, Antonin Yuji Maeno, Léa Brosseau

Images

Cutwork, sketches by Antonin Yuji Maeno

Published

March 16, 2021

Sources

  • 1
    Morizot, Baptiste. Manières d'être vivant: Enquêtes sur la vie à travers nous. Éditions Actes Sud, 2020. Purchase Book.


    2
    Ritchie, Hannah and Roser, Max. “Urbanization." Our world in Data, September, 2018, revised November, 2019. Link.


    3
    Klepeis, Neil, et all. “The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A Resource for Assessing Exposure to Environmental Pollutants.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2001. Link.


    4
    Powers, Julie and Ridge, Sheila. Nature-Based Learning for Young Children: Anytime, Anywhere, on Any Budget. Redleaf Press, December 11, 2018. Link.


    5
    Haug, Andrea. "421 million European birds have disappeared in 30 years." Futura Planète, September 20, 2019. Link.


    6
    Rosenberg, Kenneth V et all. "Decline of the North American avifauna." Science, Oct 4, 2019. Link.


    7
    Allinson, Tris. "State of the world’s birds: taking the pulse of the planet." BirdLife International. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International, 2018. Link.


    8
    Lacaze, Julie. "Birds are disappearing from the French countryside at an alarming rate.” National Geographic, October 18, 2017. Link.


    9
    Morizot, Baptiste. Ways to be Alive: Study of Life Through Us. Éditions Actes Sud, 2020. Purchase book.


    10
    Wade, Steph. The Ideal City: Exploring Urban Futures. Gestalten & SPACE10, February, 2021. Purchase book.